Search Archives
Follow Us

Featured Sponsors

Mailing List
Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletter
For Email Marketing you can trust
Twitter Feeds

This site utilizes the MLB analytics platform powered by TruMedia Networks


Less Agressive Abreu

Bobby Abreu's batting average and OBP dropped about 40 points in 2010.  Part of that was due to his walking less and striking out more.  When those two statistics move like that, it would seem the batter was getting more aggressive at the plate, maybe swinging at more bad pitches.  The opposite seemed to be the case with Bobby, however.


The following heat maps show Abreu's swing rates during the 2009 and 2010 regular seasons.


Bobby Abreu Swing Rate 2009

Note that Bobby has three distinct swing zones, and that he's not afraid to chase an outside pitch.


Bobby Abreu Swing Rate 2010

In 2010, Abreu swung mostly at pitches up and in, and did a great job of taking pitches just off the outside corner.  So why, with better selectivity did his walks go down and his strikeouts go up?  The following two heat charts show his strike rate during these two seasons.


Bobby Abreu Strike Rate 2009


Bobby Abreu Strike Rate 2010

Even through Bobby stopped swinging at outside pitches, he was still getting as many strikes off the outside edge of the plate.  I suspect this came from two umpire biases.  Batter often define their own strike zones, especially selective ones like Abreu.  Because he swung at outside pitches in 2009, those became part of his strike zone.

The second I'll call the Jack Clark effect.  At the end of his career, Clark could no longer hit very well, but retained his great eye for the strike zone.  In 320 plate appearances that season, he walked 56 times and struck out 87 for a .210/.350/.311 slash line.  As the season went on the umps realized Jack was taking more and more, and expanded the strike zone to encourage him to swing.

When Jack was willing to swing at strikes, the umps gave him the benefit of the doubt on border line pitches.  When Jack was no longer willing to swing at strikes, he lost the umpires and the border line pitches started to go to the pitcher.  That seems to be the story with Bobby.  He no longer swings at pitches clearly over the outside part of the plate, so the umpires have no reason to give him the benefit of the doubt on selectivity.  I suspect that like Jack Clark, age finally caught up to Bobby.


Phil Hughes' Cutter (Part Two)

Phil Hughes' Cutter vs. LHB
April - May.185.407.331
June - July.381.667.441
August - October.250.500.344

Phil Hughes' Cutter vs. RHB
April - May.225.275.232
June - July.444.778.530
August - October.316.632.411

Phil Hughes' Cutter - April-May

Phil Hughes' Cutter - June-July

Phil Hughes' Cutter - August-October 2nd

Since his performance numbers are based on plate appearances decided on a cutter, we're working with a relatively small sample size, especially when looking at splits.

Nonetheless, when viewed with his overall pitch frequency, two things stood out to me. First, against RHB in June and July, Hughes kept the cutter down more, and apparently this got him into more trouble. Second, Hughes avoided throwing the cutter in to lefties in June and July. However, when I split the map in half, I found he got hit harder when throwing the pitch inside during that period (.385 SLG% on the outer half compared to 1.125 SLG% on the inner half). As noted in the previous post, his cutter had less movement in June and July. This is pure speculation, but if Hughes knew he wasn't getting as much cut on that pitch, he may have avoided throwing it in to lefties.

Hamstringing Hamilton

The Giants used a two pronged approach to shut down Josh Hamilton in the World Series.  Looking at where in the strike zone Hamilton collected hits during the 2010 season (throught the ALCS), his great plate coverage becomes clear:

Josh Hamilton, batting average heat chart and movement, 2010 season through the ALCS.The low outside corner is the only place you might really get Josh.  Note also that Hamilton likes the ball moving towards him.  The Giants not only hit the low outside corner, their pitches didn't move in on Hamilton as much.

Josh Hamilton, pitch frequency and movement, 2010 World SeriesThe Giants weren't perfect, as they did put some pitches on the inside part of the plate, right where Josh usually owns a high in-play average.    Without the movement toward him, however, Josh got fooled a litte more often.